ΓΙΑ ΝΑ BUDGETΑΡΕΙΣ ΜΕΜΟΝΩΜΕΝΑ PROJECTS TREXEIΣ ΜΙΑ ΙΜ32.
ΜΕΤΑ ΓΙΑ ΝΑ ΚΑΝΕΙΣ DISTRIBUTE ΤΟ ΒUDGET ΣΤΙΣ CAPEX ΕΣΩΤ.ΕΝΤΟΛΕΣ (IO) ΠΟΥ ΕΙΝΑΙ ASSIGNED ΜΕ ΤΑ PROJECTS ΤΡΕΧΕΙΣ ΜΙΑ ΙΜ52.
ΜΕΤΑ AΠΟ ΑΥΤΟ, ΤΟ BUDGET AVAILABILITY CONTROL ΓΙΝΕΤΑΙ ACTIVE ΑΥΤΟΜΑΤΑ ΜΕ ΤΗΝ ΙΜ52 ΚΑΙ ΜΠΟΡΕΙΣ ΝΑ ΞΕΚΙΝΗΣΕΙΣ ΤΟ CAPEX SPENDING ΣΟΥ ΔΗΜΙΟΥΡΓΟΝΤΑΣ PO ΓΙΑ ΙΟ.
ΤΙ ΣΑΣ ΠΕΡΙΕΓΡΑΨΑ? ΕΝ ΣΥΝΤΟΜΙΑ ΠΩΣ ΔΟΥΛΕΥΟΥΝ ΤΑ ΕΠΕΝΔΥΤΙΚΑ ΠΡΟΓΡΑΜΜΑΤΑ ΣΤΟ SAP
ΣΕ ΤΙ ΓΛΩΣΣΑ?
AN EΡΧΕΣΑΙ ΠΡΩΤΗ ΦΟΡΑ ΣΕ ΕΠΑΦΗ ΜΕ ΤΟ SAP ΘΑ ΜΠΟΡΟΥΣΕΣ ΝΑ ΠΕΙΣ ΟΤΙ ΕΙΝΑΙ JIBBERISH (ΑΚΑΤΑΛΑΒΙΣΤΙΚΑ)
O FELIX SALMON ΑΡΘΡΟΓΡΑΦΕΙ ΣΤΟ SEEKING ALPHA ΚΑΙ ΠΡΟΣΦΑΤΑ ΤΟ REUTERS ΤΟΥ ΕΔΩΣΕ ΤΗΝ ΕΥΚΑΙΡΙΑ ΝΑ BLOGAΡΕΙ ΚΑΙ ΑΠΟ ΚΕΙ.
http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/
ΤΑ ΑΡΘΡΑ ΤΟΥ Α-ΠΟ-ΛΑΥ-ΣΤΙ-ΚΑ
ΜΕΤΑ ΑΠΟ ΑΥΤΟ ΠΟΥ ΠΑΡΑΘΕΤΩ ΠΙΟ ΚΑΤΩ, ΘΑ ΑΚΟΛΟΥΘΗΣΕΙ ΚΑΙ ΕΝΑ ΑΚΟΜΑ ΚΟΡΥΦΑΙΟ (ΚΑΙ ΤΑ 2 ΑΦΟΡΟΥΝ ΤΡΑΠΕΖΕΣ ΚΑΙ FINANCIALS)
ΣΤΙΣ 19 ΦΕΒ ΣΤΟ BLOG ΜΟΥ ΣΤΟ CAPITAL http://greekdonaldduck.capitalblogs.gr/showArticle.asp?id=16619&blid=290 ΕΙΧΑ ΣΧΟΛΙΑΣΕΙ "Απολαυστε την εποχη και μην πανικοβαλεστε σε καμια περιπτωση. Αρκει να ειστε μακρυα απο banking, financial και retail sectors σταθερα"
ΜΕ ΒΑΣΗ ΑΥΤΟ, ΑΠΟΛΑΥΣΤΕ ΤΟ ΑΡΘΡΟ ΤΟΥ FELIX SALMON THΣ 17ΗΣ ΑΠΡΙΛΙΟΥ ΜΑΖΙ ΜΕ ΤΑ ΣΧΟΛΙΑ, ΠΟΥ ΑΦΟΡΑ ΤΟ CONFERENCE CALL ΤΗΣ CITIBANK ΓΙΑ ΤΟ Q1 2009, ΔΕΙΤΕ ΚΑΙ ΤΗ ΦΟΒΕΡΗ ΣΤΙΧΟΜΥΘΙΑ NED KELLY (CITIGROUP CFO ΠΟΥ ΜΙΛΑΕΙ ΟΣΟ ΠΙΟ ΑΚΑΤΑΛΑΒΙΣΤΙΚΑ ΜΠΟΡΕΙ) - MEREDITH WHITNEY ΚΑΙ ΜΕΤΑ ΣΚΕΦΤΕΙΤΕ
ΘΑ ΑΓΟΡΑΖΑΤΕ ΤΡΑΠΕΖΕΣ META?
http://seekingalpha.com/article/131531-citigroup-s-horrible-conference-call
ΤΟ ΚΟΡΥΦΑΙΟ ΤΟΥ ΑΡΘΡΟ ΓΙΑ ΠΟΛΥ ΨΑΓΜΕΝΟΥΣ ΤΟ ΑΦΗΝΩ ΓΙΑ ΠΙΟ ΜΕΤΑ
ΚΑΛΟ ΒΡΑΔΥ
Εγγραφή σε:
Σχόλια ανάρτησης (Atom)
KAΠΟΙΟΣ SIMON SMELT ΣΧΟΛΙΑΖΕΙ "The Citigroup quarter results and conference call are intended to help boost C price in the short term, so knowledgeable folk can exit their holdings for more than small change."
ΑπάντησηΔιαγραφήO PROXIMO ΜΕ ΠΙΟ ΠΟΛΥ ΧΙΟΥΜΟΡ: "The dialogue in the article reminds me of a quote I read somewhere a while back: "I know you believe you understand what you think I said, but I am not so sure you realize that what you heard is not what I meant."
KAΠΟΙΟΣ ΑΛΛΟΣ ΑΠΑΝΤΑΕΙ ΣΤΟΝ PROXIMO ΣΤΟ ΚΑΠΑΚΙ: "This is a reflection on everyone who holds C."!!!!!
ΑπάντησηΔιαγραφήO aarc ΚΑΝΕΙ ΜΙΑ ΕΝΔΘΑΦΕΡΟΥΣΑ ΤΟΠΟΘΕΤΗΣΗ: "This only shows that Mark to Market actually do not show real losses or income.
ΑπάντησηΔιαγραφήIf you mark your assets to today's prices but don't sell them, you incur profits or losses that are not for real.
The only time you make a profit or a loss from initial capital is when you actually liquidate your asset(s).
And invetors are selling bank stocks based on "fake losses" and buying them based on "fake profits"?
It is how Americans have been living their lives -based on dreams instead of realities. Based on the American Dream instead of Realities of Life?
They hold asset investments. When the price of their assets went high. They consider the difference from their initial capital as a profit and spend it - while still holding the assets whose price may go up or down. When the assets price plunged, they have already spent the supposed profits. If they liquidate such assets, they will not only incur losses due to price differential but also losses from spending all those fleeting mark to market profits.
Mark to market led consumers to use their real-estate assets and their stock market holdings as their personal ATMs.
Banks use the mark to market to justify massive bonuses based on profits that may or may not materialize and drove their companies down with marked down losses that may or may not actually happen.
We will never know if we made profits or incur losses until we liquidate our assets.
Marking them to market only provide us the means to fool ourselves. A foolish dream of profits and losses that will never materialize until we liquidate our assets.
Mark to market is a very dangerous tool the government is trying to implement in order to provide company balance sheet transparency. Obviously, mark to market end result until now is to further muddy the waters.
Go back to basics - real profits and real losses.
Cold hard cash upon asset liquidation cannot be manipulated.
Stop manipulating assets values with Mark to Market."
KAΠΟΙΟΣ DAVID VAN KNAPP ΛΕΕΙ ΠΟΛΥ ΕΥΣΤΟΧΑ: "From the article: "Is this English? No. Is it useful? No. Is it the kind of thing that investors in Citigroup in any way want to hear? No.... Citigroup would have been much better served by someone who was clear and direct about what was going on within the company, financially...."
ΑπάντησηΔιαγραφήGiven this, why does anyone own C? One of Buffett's great rules is, don't invest in any business you can't understand. It sounds like nobody outside C understands C. So why invest in it?"
KAI TO ΚΟΡΥΦΑΙΟ ΣΧΟΛΙΟ...AΠΟ ΤΟΝ omnicognisant
ΑπάντησηΔιαγραφήO CFO ΤΗΣ CITI...ΝΕD KELLY...
"I just love the guys name. In Australian history we have a very famous Ned Kelly, he was a bushranger who specialized in robbing banks. The symbology is just perfect. See en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ned_Kelly for reference"
ΚΑΛΟ ΒΡΑΔΥ
ΚΑΙ ΓΙΑ ΟΣΟΥΣ ΑΚΟΜΑ ΠΙΣΤΕΥΟΥΝ ΟΤΙ ΟΙ ΗΠΑ ΕΧΟΥΝ ΤΟ ΠΙΟ ΧΟΝΤΡΟ ΠΡΟΒΛΗΜΑ...
ΑπάντησηΔιαγραφήΤΟΥΣ ΤΟ ΑΦΙΕΡΩΝΩ
27 ΑΠΡΙΛΙΟΥ 2009
http://www.rgemonitor.com/globalmacro-monitor/256544/german_banks_loaded_with_816_billion_in_toxic_paper
ΤΟ RGE MONITOR ΕΙΝΑΙ Ο ΙΣΤΟΤΟΠΟΣ ΤΟΥ ΚΑΘΗΓΗΤΗ. ΓΙΑ ΔΩΡΕΑΝ ΠΡΟΣΒΑΣΗ ΣΕ ΟΛΑ ΤΑ ΑΡΘΡΑ ΑΡΚΕΙ FREE REGISTRATION